Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: K-Stater
It is called “Title 8”, a very long and very bloviated section of the US code, where according to progressive revisionists, it means whatever the current congress wants it to mean even though it has not been changed.

However, Title 8 can not be defined without its connecting laws that pertain to expatriation & denaturalization. Anyone who has had a former citizenship/allegiance, including children born within the United States, are subject to denaturalization laws. Natural born are not subject to these laws because they never owed allegiance to any other but the United States. Its called the doctrine of “statelessness” and there have been many cases including one just recently decided by SCOTUS where it was determined that a child born with dual allegiance would not be left stateless if American citizenship was denied or taken away.

IOW, Obama would never be left stateless because he has at least one foreign country that claims him as one of their own.

87 posted on 04/08/2011 7:14:07 AM PDT by patlin (Reagan was a Democrat before he was a Republican: "I didn't leave the Democrat Party, they left me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: patlin
It is called “Title 8”, a very long and very bloviated section of the US code...

Title 8 > Chapter 12 > Subchapter III. I know that. Nothing in there regulates dual citizenship that I'm aware of. Nor should it - the U.S. can no more control the citizenship laws of other countries than they can control our's.

91 posted on 04/08/2011 7:40:14 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson