Read it again, it doesn’t mean what you claim it to mean.
*sigh* Or just go have an adult explain it to you.
ToadCode said:
“Read it again, it doesn’t mean what you claim it to mean.
*sigh* Or just go have an adult explain it to you.”
I guess you missed the point about it not mattering what it said. It is not binding because you CANNOT override a Constitutional Article with a statute.
It is only use is as a tool to look upon the window of the founders thinking. It has no other purpose in law or history.
The First Congress SPECIFICALLY prohibited citizenship from transferring to the offspring of a foreign father.