Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/05/2011 11:05:52 PM PDT by stevelackner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: stevelackner

Just do what the DEA has done, require a license to acquire schedule 1 drugs, and never issue that license. Instead require a permit to open a adult bookstore and never issue that permit.


2 posted on 04/05/2011 11:08:11 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner
Hahaha..... they will pry my spatula from cold dead hands.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

3 posted on 04/05/2011 11:09:00 PM PDT by expatguy (Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

When I was a kid if I hadn’t had a hole in my pocket I wouldn’t have had no toys to play with.


4 posted on 04/05/2011 11:16:06 PM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

Since when is government the protector of morality? They do everything they can to make that word meaningless.


5 posted on 04/05/2011 11:17:44 PM PDT by wastedyears (It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shibumi; humblegunner; 50mm; Allegra; JoeProBono; Grizzled Bear; TheOldLady; ...
Too vague.

Define "sex toy".


12 posted on 04/05/2011 11:40:08 PM PDT by Salamander (I made friends with a lot of people in the Danger Zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

No matter what you think of said device or product, the thought of federal oversight of it is infinitesimally more perverse.


15 posted on 04/06/2011 12:04:02 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

I’ve always said the government would someday tax masturbation. Why not tax sex aids? :)


16 posted on 04/06/2011 12:07:30 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

“Lawrence was at the very least an incoherent Supreme Court decision in that it was intentionally vague regarding the reasoning being used.”

Lawrence was incoherent because there is no constitutional basis for the decision. It was just five justices who disagreed with a state law. Ultimately, that was the rationale for the decision.

But when you try to manufacture a credible rationale out of whole cloth, it usually comes out incoherent. When courts abandon principle, there then becomes no way to distinguish Lawrence from a state law prohibiting protest outside abortion clinics, except that Justice Kennedy thinks sodomy is a good thing while exercising your free speech rights outside an abortion clinic is not.

Of course, there is a simple way to distinguish the two situations—the constitution protects free speech but not sodomy. But who cares about that when Justice Kennedy knows better.


19 posted on 04/06/2011 12:29:08 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

Given that buggery is considered a “right” — whatever passed for reasoning there is bound to pass for reasoning when considering any toy, unless it is an item which can be proven physically harmful (and even then the masochist sector may demur). I detest this state of affairs, but it seems that hole has been drilled (no pun intended).


29 posted on 04/06/2011 1:19:17 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

This is BS, the courts have no business ruling on what is moral and what isn’t. Soon, we would be as bad as the muslims, ruling on morality of individuals and slapping them in jail or stoning them to death. You can’t let courts do this kind of crap because there is no end to it once it starts.


46 posted on 04/06/2011 2:10:40 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

Guess I won’t be allowed to plant cucumbers in my garden.


60 posted on 04/06/2011 3:26:18 AM PDT by bikerman (Where Has My America Gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. "
Seems pretty clear to me....the framers designed our political system to keep all politics local...the feds have no business being involved in this issue at all
65 posted on 04/06/2011 4:40:17 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

They can never ban Mother Palm and her 5 girls.


66 posted on 04/06/2011 4:41:37 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevelackner

Three words: “Hitachi Magic Wand”.


67 posted on 04/06/2011 4:49:33 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson