[Creme Brulee]

Well, thank goodness that’s settled. So, this’ll have him ousted tomorrow? No? More ineffectual fluff & puffery? I guess the realists will just keep working to vote him gone instead of relying on document magic to dissolve him.

Did you even bother reading the article, before posting that comment? Of course not. Because, had you read it, you would have seen no suggestion that this information could be used to remove him. It simply explained how birth announcements came to appear in Hawaiian newspapers. In other words, it addressed the bogus claim that somehow these announcements are enough to prove he was born in Hawaii.

[humblegunner]

Did you even bother reading the article, before posting that comment?

Yeah, Creamy..I read what was posted here.
I'm not giving any hits to a scummy blogpimp. Why is this drivel excerpted?

It simply explained how birth announcements came to appear in Hawaiian newspapers.

To what end?

it addressed the bogus claim that somehow these announcements are enough to prove he was born in Hawaii.

Well and good. Let's say he was born on Mars.
What can be done about it now?

Vote him out.