Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SuzyQue

Like 17-18%, would you say?

Lot of people stopped looking a long time ago


4 posted on 03/31/2011 6:06:43 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganite Republican

Most of the people I know 50 and up - if they lose their job they simply don’t think they’ll ever work again.

One woman I know is working two part time fast food jobs. She used to be an office manager. But she’s older, and after two + years she just gave up.


6 posted on 03/31/2011 6:10:13 AM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
Like 17-18%, would you say?

I did some research recently trying to ascertain what the current size of the workforce is. In the end, I used 156M. I was looking at how remarkably few individual taxpayers pay the bills. ~7.8M individuals pay 60% of the taxes!

Along the way I also learned that the current U3 unemployment rate is calculated using a "workforce" figure derived as "the number of people who have actively looked for work in the last 4 weeks." If the U3 unemployment was calculated as it was in 1992, today's unemployment would exceed 20%.

These numbers are so obfuscated and massaged, it is hard to find numbers you can have confidence in.

8 posted on 03/31/2011 6:29:40 AM PDT by IamConservative (Liberalism - the surety of knowing that which cannot be proven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson