[Diogenesis]

If there was EVER proof you are a RomneyBOT (and a deluded one at that)
your last post proves it.

CAN YOU READ ENGLISH?????

You rely and quote all the magazines that support your backstabbing Romney
including FOX NEWs, CNN, MSNBC, Christian Science Monitor, etc.

However, NOTE: You left out the ONLY important citation, you lying RomneyBOT,
and THAT is the The Massachusetts Constitution (destroyed by Mitt Romney ).

The Massachusetts Constitution states:

"The power of suspending the laws, or (suspending)
the execution of the laws, ought never to be exercised but by the legislature..."

That does NOT read that Laws are to be changed by
Bishop Romney threats, does it?
But, oh my, how you so LOVE him, don't you, RomneyBOT.

At the end of the day, Bishop Carpetbagger Willard Romney acted "on his own"
in illegal legislative authority
issuing "a directive to the Justices of the Peace that
they MUST perform same-sex marriages
or 'face personal liability' or be fired."

No wonder he fled Massachusetts.

[Right Wingnut 2]

Palin on the Issues: National Security http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2697715/posts

[CharlesWayneCT]

The court neither suspended the law, nor suspended execution of the law. As several of the citations I provided for you pointed out, if you had read them (the legal ones from the various law resources). They interpreted an existing law (badly), in the manner that courts do all the time. The court ruled that the words "man and wife" in the statute were gender-neutral, and therefore applied to any two people.

I guess this is complicated, although it doesn't seem so to me. The argument for me is easy, but problematic in that I think the court was wrong, and should have ruled otherwise.