1st rule of interpretation...you have to be able to read it correctly. Go back & read “JUST” the “BOLD PRINT”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2695311/posts?page=63#63
1st rule of interpretation...you have to be able to read it correctly. Go back & read JUST the BOLD PRINT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2695311/posts?page=63#63
Has any court of law in the nation supported that position with a decision on an Obama eligibility lawsuit?
Who do you suspect Majority Leader Harry Reid and the 53 Democrats in the US Senate would name to replace the current president?
My money’s on Joe Biden.
And on the House of Representatives side: [On Obamas eligibility] I dont think its an issue that we need to address at all, it is not an issue that even needs to be on the policy-making table right now whatsoever.Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor
“The state of Hawaii has said he was born there. That’s good enough for me, The president says he’s a Christian. I accept him at his word.”Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner
Now that Trump has made an impact on this, the numbers of “important people” willing to ask questions seems to be growing.
I am beginning to feel a glimmer of hope in the fact that even the liberals seem to be less likely to answer back with, “He's already shown us the birth certificate.”
When Trump says Obama hasn't shown his Birth certificate, the response is seems to be turning toward, “Why should he be pushed to turn it over?” In my mind that's a small improvement over “He already has.” or “I'm holding a copy of it right here.”
What argument will these people rally around if the balance of power begins to shift, when there aren't so many more big names on their side?