Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll
It is easy to be angry with the people we hoped would go after Obama on this issue.

But if those radio and TV sources had done so, and the government had shut down them down, how much do you think we would know about other things Obama and his fellow running dogs have done?

Well actually how would the government legally shut them down> If they did it would have caused an immediate war with the government over violation of the first amendment..people would have to do it before they took away the 2nd amendment...maybe this would be over by now if someone had pursued the question, either by getting it answered or getting shut down and the resulting revolt.

111 posted on 03/26/2011 8:24:53 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone

I can see your point.

It doesn’t look like too many have been willing to fall on their swords except in the military. And how many are now in prison for making the challenge?

I don’t for a moment think that Obama would have hesitated to declare martial law if any of the news stations went viral with his eligibility and riots occurred. I suspect he was just waiting for one of them to do just that.

At the same time, however, Republicans were emphasizing the necessity to win and win big in the forthcoming elections. I suspect they understood that the most efficient way to remove Obama was through acts of Congress.

Obama cannot be challenged in the courts as the U.S.Constitution states that only Congress can remove a President from office.


129 posted on 03/26/2011 9:53:01 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson