Yes, that was the only NEWS article I found in your link. The rest were op-eds, book reviews, blogs and websites. Those don't count as news articles in my book. If you want to call those news articles, fine. I really don't see the point of arguing what is or is not a news article.
So suppose your claim were right, and numerous news articles got her first name wrong. So what? Why do you think this is so important and so damning?
Again, lying and misleading. The article clearly denotes in each paragraph that contains a link whether the link is to a NEWS STORY, a blog, a book review, an encyclopedia, an AOL story, a book, a genealogical article, etc. There are NUMEROUS NEWS STORIES linked. You simply do not want people to see and realize the truth.
Do you all notice how incurious moves the goal post? First denigrate all the links as blogs. Then, when proven wrong, redefine what a news article is. It all depends upon what the definition of is, is. You see? It’s impossible to debate HONESTLY with people like this, who won’t even agree upon what WORDS mean. If we have no common language, then it’s useless to continue to speak.
“Suppose” my claim is right?!! After being presented with NUMEROUS examples that PROVE my “claim” IS RIGHT, you still persist in calling it a “claim” and just “supposing” it’s right. IT IS RIGHT AND YOU CAN’T EVEN BRING YOURSELF TO ADMIT IT.
What is it so important that her name was first Shirley and then suddenly became Stanley? Why is it important that he first was born in Queen’s Medical and then in Kapiolani? Why is it so important that first Dr. West delivered him but then he didn’t? Why is it so important that he ADMITS THAT HIS LIFE STORY IS A LIE? He does, you know.
It’s important because there is plenty of evidence that indicates he is NOT who and what he claims that he is and NO EVIDENCE to support that he is who and what he claims that he is. That’s why.