To: PA Engineer
That sounds like a theory and not a fact. It's no less than a theory than the contention that his SSN is fraudulant. The only difference is that my theory actually fits the facts, whereas yours does not.
The fact is Obama had a Connecticut SS#.
Sure, and it means nothing.
He never corrected the problem if indeed there is any validity to your theory.
There is no problem to correct.
To: curiosity
The only difference is that my theory actually fits the facts, whereas yours does not.
What theory? Fact. He had a Connecticut SS#. Worse. He had a dead man's social security number! You are holding onto a conclusion in search of pixie dust facts to support it. Deal with it rather than trying to explain away the obvious.
HE HAD A DEAD MAN'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.
There was no agency screw up there. There is no reach up the butt theory of plausible deniability either. Move along.
30 posted on
03/22/2011 2:37:46 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media. There are Wars and Rumors of War.)
To: curiosity
It's no less than a theory than the contention that his SSN is fraudulant. The only difference is that my theory actually fits the facts, whereas yours does not.Ah, you're an Obamabot!!
How does your theory explain why no less than 9 SSNs have been connected to Obama, as other researchers have found?
55 posted on
03/22/2011 3:29:58 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Go green - recycle Congress in 2012!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson