Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr. O'Bombers' War
Town Hall ^ | 3/21/11 | reasonmclucus

Posted on 03/21/2011 4:36:48 PM PDT by kathsua

Barack Obama who ran on a platform of ending his predecessor's wars has apparently decided he wants his own war. As candidate Obama, he felt Congress should have a role in such decisions. As President O'Bomber, he thinks he can ignore Congress.

Like his predecessors O'Bomber is starting out with a bombing campaign. He hasn't said whether he will send Marines back to the shores of Tripoli if the bombing campaign fails to cause a surrender. Bombing didn't produce a surrender in Vietnam and Iraq. Muammar Gaddafi doesn't seem any more likely to relinquish power because of a bombing campaign than Saddam Hussein was.

Barack O'Bomber claims he is acting because the Libyan government has attacked those protesting the government, but Libya isn't the only government to use violence to put down protests.

Syria has been accused of using violence against protectors. Will O'Bomber also attack Syria? It would be easy considering we already have troops in neighboring Iraq. They could be moved out of Iraq and into Syria.

Will O'Bomber attack Iran which reportedly has been putting down mass protests? He could use it as an excuse to take out Iran's nuclear facilities. Prior to the election O'Bomber said he considered Iran a "tiny country" even though it's the 17th most populous nation in the world with a population is 78% that of Nazi Germany, a country which conquered Europe. from the Atlantic's to near Moscow.

China has killed protectors before. Does that mean the U.S. should consider attacking China?

I'm worried that if Gaddafi does give in to the bombing campaign, O'Bomber and the other Western Imperialists will think they can do the same thing in any country with a form of government they disapprove of. That is if they are really motivated by Gaddafi's treatment of his subjects rather than his oil.

If NATO is really concerned about injustice, why didn't it intervene in Darfur?

If O'Bomber succeeds in destroying the Libyan military will he or the Europeans spend years reestablishing order setting up a new government? Or will they let it become a lawless country like Somalia"

The most disturbing aspect of O'Bomber's action is his failure to consult Congress like Lyndon Johnson did before bombing North Vietnam and George W. Bush did before bombing Saddam Hussein. Both of those presidents took the lead in getting the U.S. involved in a war. O'Bomber seems to be following the orders of the European governments who get their oil from Libya.

Regardless of whether or not Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or not, he was born a British subject because his father was a British subject. Unless he formally renounced that citizenship he may still be a British subject and may be following the orders of his Queen in determining how to respond to Libya.

Those who like to protest America involvement in foreign wars need to start protesting now instead of waiting until the Marines land in Tripoli.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: congress; libya; noflyzone; obama; obomber
What should we expect from a British subject President?

Meanwhile he's vacationing in South America instead of staying in Washington to monitor the situation while American lives are at risk.

1 posted on 03/21/2011 4:36:57 PM PDT by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kathsua
Here is the stark truth and a warning to Israel. If O'bomber will stealth-fully trigger death and destruction upon his old friend Kadaffy, why not be fair and level Tel Aviv?

The Resident of the United States is dangerous. Ridicule him at your peril. That we elected this vagabond gnome is an astounding condemnation on this once Great Nation. Even worse, NOBODY has the nuts to lead a legal attack on his unconstitutional authority.

As George Will rightly points out, who the hell are we to sort out Bedoin Tribal feuds? Any moron knows we are doomed to face the law of unintended consequence .

2 posted on 03/21/2011 5:38:32 PM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

He’s the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen. He’s gonna have some explaining to do in 2012 when he has to reconcile his 2008 campaign rhetoric with his 2012 track record.


3 posted on 03/21/2011 5:39:51 PM PDT by RC one ("merchants have no country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson