You can easily verify the information he presents. It’s certainly a more credible source than CNN. And it’s a more credible source than the panic-stricken, potassium iodide swilling idiots that seem to have flooded FR over the last few days. I mean for heaven’s sake, one of these idiots has posted a map showing 1000’s of RADs falling on the US. That isn’t a possible scenario no matter WHAT happened at the plant.
Of course, everyone will have to decide for themselves. If you want to go hunker in the bunker, be my guest.
No, sorry, I must be not as knowledgeable as you are.
I know quite a bit of physics, but to form an opinion on this matter, that is not enough: one needs to know (i) nuclear engineering, (ii) construction of the specific plants in question, and (iii) events at those plants as they actually occurred rather than reported.
I do find it grossly misleading and unbecoming for a scientist to be misrepresent his qualifications: it is not true that he is a "Ph.D. scientist:" his Ph.D. is in a completely different "science," which is not even natural one.