Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I must say I have to question their siting. I can’t believe they were built so close to the coast.


5 posted on 03/12/2011 3:18:07 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster

You know, it is interesting because I was looking at the site via the news, and the site seems to be on a bluff. I think the damage was could have been caused by the earthquake rather than the tsunami. Either way, the pebble bed system would have eliminated the problem. I think Japan probably uses pebble bed reactors, but I think this is probably an older reactor.


6 posted on 03/12/2011 3:26:33 AM PST by Sarah-bot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster

You know, it is interesting because I was looking at the site via the news, and the site seems to be on a bluff. I think the damage was could have been caused by the earthquake rather than the tsunami. Either way, the pebble bed system would have eliminated the problem. I think Japan probably uses pebble bed reactors, but I think this is probably an older reactor.


7 posted on 03/12/2011 3:26:44 AM PST by Sarah-bot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster
"I must say I have to question their siting. I can’t believe they were built so close to the coast."

Power plants need a lot of water. Many, if not most, reactors are built on coasts.

8 posted on 03/12/2011 3:27:19 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster

well you know they do need water for cooling


19 posted on 03/12/2011 4:57:20 AM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson