Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Morgan: “Was the Economic Crisis Manufactured?”
The Radio Patriot ^ | Mar. 5, 2011 | Andrea Shea King

Posted on 03/05/2011 11:31:30 AM PST by patriotgal1787

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Engedi

I think Soros’ goons called McCain on Sept 13th and told him that he would lose the election or else Soros would make a run on the bank that would shatter the entire world economy and turn the US communist. We know that Obama called McCain that morning and by 2pm McCain returned Obama’s call and shortly thereafter went on national TV to say he was suspending his campaign and wanted the debates postponed or canceled.

Just like Soros’ goons called President Bush on the same day and said “You will get TARP to pass or else I and my allies who made the first run on the bank will do it again on a grander scale and the USA is history.” (They probably didn’t tell Bush that TARP was only really needed to pay back Bank of America’s silence on who actually made the run on the bank, so the whole nefarious plan could remain hidden) Sure enough, GW Bush got on TV that night and said the whole western economy was history if the USA didn’t pass TARP.

I don’t have proof that this happened, but all the evidence I can find points to it.

As Kanjorski said on a TV interview later, there was no way that 700 billion could even BEGIN to actually make a difference in toxic assets; the estimate was that it would take 2-3 TRILLION to do that. So TARP wasn’t needed for the real economic effects it would have; TARP was meant to keep some other fatal event from happening, and my money says it was another run on the bank by Soros and his sharia-compliant Islamist folks and communist-sympathizing folks. The banks that were bailed out were (almost?) all sharia-compliant, foreign-owned banks that contributed heavily to both the democrats and to ACORN.

And Eric Holder worked with Bank of America to keep Wikileaks from being able to expose their involvement in the financial crash. There is a reason that even after all this happened, nobody has gotten to the bottom of exactly who made the run on the bank. That information is being hidden/protected because SOMEBODY at a high level is able to keep it secret - and it looks like it may be Eric Holder.


21 posted on 03/05/2011 1:08:57 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

 

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Try this one on for size and read past the first couple sentences and paragraphs:

It’s like a bunch of rich guys running around acting altruistic and claiming the death tax should be reinstated or at higher levels.

What they don’t tell you is their holdings include companies who profit from estate planning, income shelter, etc.

If the government has no death tax it is a direct competition to the insurance companies, law firms, Wall Street, etc.

Without the death tax there is no need for their services and such stringent estate planning.

Here is an excellent video explaining Warren Buffet and Berkshire-Hathaway. Get a cup of coffee and watch it. You will see the scheme explained and then you will get it.

Also note what companies he has acquired, how and why:

Why This Superrich Guy Likes High Taxes
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/8035391/

Warren Buffett Benefited From Death Tax
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=15951

Wanna know why Buffet pushed for TARP bailout?
Suffice it to say Berkshire owned stock in some largest receipents of TARP valued at $13 billion around that time.

Here is the funny part:
Buffett increased his bank holdings in September, while he was arguing in the media that Congress should approve the bailout to prevent the collapse of the global financial system.

TARP was approved in October of that year, just one month later!

It’s good to be king!

He actually said “if he didn’t think the government was going to act(in a way that would positive and accretive to hihis holding) he wouldn’t have been doing anything that week”. (paraphrased)

For more read here:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/04/05/65496/buffett-champion-of-bailout-is.html

BofA in April 2009 was around $4 per share and is now trading at $13.80 per share as of 3/02/2001

Wells Fargo in April of 2009 was around $11 per share and is now trading at around $31 per share.

How about US Bancorp trading at around $14 per share in April 2009 and now trading at about $26 per share.

Goldman Sachs Group trading at some $51 dollars per share has now zoomed to above $160 per share.

How about those poor folks at American Express trading at just above $10 per share in 2009 and now they are trading at about $45 per share?

Bottom line: We, the schmuck taxpayer, paid to enhance the holdings of companies like Berkshire and investors in Berkshire.


22 posted on 03/05/2011 1:18:51 PM PST by Vendome (DonÂ’t take life so seriously... YouÂ’ll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Eric Holder = loyal member of Sneakyman Inc., we are at war with a corp.!
23 posted on 03/05/2011 1:19:44 PM PST by de.rm ("Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, 3 times is enemy action. Auric Goldfinger Let us prey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

It would be interesting to find out who said that. I wonder when this guy found this stuff out, in relation to measures taken to insure that the groundwork was laid for the September run on the bank. How soon did the inside operatives know this plan was going to guarantee Obama’s election?

I have no doubts that this whole thing had been in the works for a long time. When Soros’ people threatened the media heads if they reported on the eligibility issue, sometime in October of 2008, they could only do that if they KNEW Obama would be elected, because the threat of FCC annihilation was a vain threat unless the outcome of the election was absolutely known in advance. Obama did not win by a landslide so there was some other weapon in their arsenal that they considered absolutely undefeatable.

I don’t doubt that sleepers are here in the USA; I suspect that Louis Farrakhan may have made his comments about the Middle East riots coming to the USA because he knows these sleepers have been given a wide-open door by Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano.

But I don’t think the weapon they relied on was terrorism, because terrorism would have been an opportunity for Bush to declare martial law and suspend the election, and would also bring out the importance of national security - which was Obama’s absolute lowest issue, that McCain beat him soundly on.


24 posted on 03/05/2011 1:19:52 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Thank you so very much for all the research you have done....and the SHARING of it.


25 posted on 03/05/2011 7:16:09 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson