Just by stating they have a goal they have proven they are not scientists. They are looking for an outcome and so their observations are all tainted.
This false worship of fake science is an evil thing. In the end it seems to only dupe people who have no understanding of math and science or left wing wackjobs that do not have an objective mind.
The math in the past data was manipulated
Independent critical scientific review was squashed
Peer review had/has an agenda
Scientists admitted to all of this
Water vapor is the #1 greenhouse gas
The Sun’s activity is the #1 influence on global tempratures
Natural cycles cause warming and cooling ... Not man
What men caused the end of the last ice age?
Limiting CO2 output is insane unless we start by killing commies, socialists, and liberals first and seeing how it works out. Otherwise I am against it in total since plants need CO2.
“Just by stating they have a goal they have proven they are not scientists. They are looking for an outcome and so their observations are all tainted.”
Exactly right.
“Peer review had/has an agenda”
This is the worst part of it. Peer review has worked just fine in the past. When a real scientific researcher presented a “finding” that has far reaching consequences, his peers would put their “skeptic” hats on and tear into him. He had better be ready to show that he has looked into more mundane explanations of his findings. If he’s convincing and reputable enough, and if he’s lucky, other scientists would repeat his research in an effort to disprove it, rather than just dismiss him offhand as just another hot dog. Occasionally, he’ll be right and become a hero. But the more earth shaking a researcher’s findings, the more likely that the skeptics will find something wrong with his work.
The Global Warming crowd is the modern day Inquisition. Skeptics, who have always been the policemen of real science, are now burned at the stake by the politicized junk scientists.