All state/county issued birth certificates that can be used to obtain a US passport are printed on security paper that eliminates the possiblity of alteration.
Here’s a link to a powerpoint presentation made by one of the government officials in Hawaii who authenticated Barack Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate:
We have not seen Obama’s birth certificate, so how can it be confirmed as valid by anyone???
All we have seen is a digital COLB on partisan websites that amount to nothing more than political advertising making certain claims that may not be true.
Even Abercrombie after his extensive investigation could only muster a statement that Obama’s birth is “written down somewhere” in the states archives. Egads!!!
After 7 years he is still unable to provide any tangible evidence that Barack Huseein Obama II was born in Hawaii, and he won’t be providing it anytime soon.
We have not seen Obama’s birth certificate, so how can it be confirmed as valid by anyone???
All we have seen is a digital COLB on partisan websites that amount to nothing more than political advertising making certain claims that may not be true.
Even Abercrombie after his extensive investigation could only muster a statement that Obama’s birth is “written down somewhere” in the states archives. Egads!!!
After 7 years he is still unable to provide any tangible evidence that Barack Huseein Obama II was born in Hawaii, and he won’t be providing it anytime soon.
Here’s how a US District Court Judge appointed by President George W. Bush put it in ruling on an Obama Eligibility Lawsuit:
“The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought.
Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office.
See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of 378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, “the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961”).”
The Judge went on to say in his ruling that: “A spurious charge questioning the President’s legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment. But a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a charge that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”
US District Court Judge Clay R. Land, Middle District of Georgia, “Rhodes v MacDonald.”