It is not possible to determine the authenticity of a document from a scanned image of that document posted on a web site. Both printers and scanners introduce artifacts to the image of any document. For authentification, you need a hard copy.
______________________________________________________________________________
We have found a genuine point of agreement. And it agrees with what Sandra Lines stated in her signed affidavit.
Since Fight the Smears is an advertising site and has not obligation or reason to ‘publish’ or post fact it is reasonable to assume that both Daily KOS and Factcheck are registered and legally in the same category. Thus, all 3 can post whatever they like regardless of authenticity or accurateness. So members of those are probably protected from formal criminal prosecution using their 1st amendment rights.
That is the shell game that has been played. When people say ‘Obama released...’ someone from the media/press needs to say ‘no they did not...a website that acts a front released...’ and that should happen until an actual document and supporting, detailed facts are presented from an actual human in the 3D real world representing the current holder of office of President.
Peace.
Not to come across as uninformed, but did not one of our own Freepers prove Rather’s Burkett docs were forgeries based on online images alone? That is my understanding, anyway. Am I missing the point, and/or comparing apples to oranges?