Posted on 02/22/2011 4:06:47 AM PST by Suvroc10
Scott Brown rejects Tea Party, says it’s not productive to criticize Obama. When Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts was elected to serve the remainder of the term of the deceased Ted Kennedy last year, conservatives had decent hopes for him. After all, Brown nationalized his election battle by saying that he would vote against Obamacare. That pledge brought him huge support from the Tea Party, which worked hard to help him get elected. Since then, however, Brown has revealed himself to be what he truly is: a RINO Republican who does much of the Democrats’ bidding. With that in mind, it was no surprise to hear the senator say that he considers himself a Massachusetts Republican exclusively and not a Tea Partier by any means. He also confirmed how correct conservatives have been to criticize his performance, as he refused to criticize Barack Obama and called Obama criticism unproductive.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
When would that be or have been?
It’s just like adding another mcstain or little me-me graham. You know you are going to catch a knife in the back it’s just a question of when and how many from your “good friends, colleagues and fellow republicans...”
saw the interview and thought he was really hostile toward the Tea Party. And what other “groups” got him elected? This man is really deceptive - just like the Dems.
Please. Common sense is not welcome here. :)
AMEN! Although he has a DILF.
;)
Good point,
I am sticking until I see who is the nominee this go around.
Another old fool whose “time has come” and I’ll change parties to the conservative party
He was elected for one thing. Have you forgotten?
They’re both attractive, IMO.
“Scott Brown rejects Tea Party, says it’s not productive to criticize Obama”
Hey, Mr. Pinup Pimp:
NO SOUP FOR YOU! NEXT!
Productive? I’m not sure that’s the term to use in this case. I’d go with “realistic” instead.
Is it realistic to back a RINO? No. And this particular RINO is no longer needed. Next year should see the true destruction of the Rats, so his wishy-washy act needn’t be tolerated for a numbers game in the Senate.
And don’t be surprised if Scotty runs as an IND, especially if it looks like the Rats put up a strong candidate.
Thank you! When one takes the time to look at how this person voted on the important issues (START, DADT and Frank/Dodd), he voted the exact same way Coakley would have.
Enough of voting for the “R”, when the “R” means nothing to the person who’s name it’s attached to.
Screw Scott Brown and the horse he came in on.
I disagree. He caught the Dems flatfooted last time. This time it's unlikely he'd be reelected even with Tea Party support unless he does some major sucking up to Dems. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he switched parties before the next election. At the very least he's putting himself in a better position for a political appointment once he loses. He's an Arlen Specter Republican -- a user who will do whatever it takes to benefit himself, party affiliation be damned.
I second everything you wrote; perfectly said!!!
So it’s realistic for you to vote for a democrat? You’re right, that’ll show ‘em.
I saw him interviewed this morning and thought was a Girly-Man, a Stuart “I’m OK! You’re OK” Smalley type.
That's all I ever hear him talking about these days, I bet he's some kind of pervert!
Brown has screwed himself with his votes and actions and along the way has pissed off the coalition that got him elected. Great strategy. Where's he going to get votes from? MA Rats? Nope, they'll vote for the official Rat. It's a certainty that the Rats won't run a empty pant suit this time around.
Brown's an opportunist, pure and simple. The Republican Party does not need (Crist, Murkowski, Specter, etc.) them.
I wonder how long it will before we read about, “Sen. Scott Brown - R(ino) , apparently intoxicated, drove off a bridge in New England and swam to safety, leaving a young girl to drown in the submerged vehicle”.?
You said you’ll vote for the democrat. What does that make you? It sure isn’t a realist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.