I'm thinkin that was way, way down on her "to do" list...Sorry Sparky, but that was the lamest bash against Sarah Palin that I've ever read.......Sheesh!
Posted on 02/19/2011 10:14:16 AM PST by Ol' Sparky
Edited on 02/19/2011 1:04:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
At least one mystery from Sarah Palin's short reign as governor of Alaska appears to have been cleared up by claims made in a manuscript for a book proposed by former Palin aide and confident Frank Bailey.
Many have wondered why Palin, who professes to be pro-life, named to the Alaska Supreme Court Morgan Christen, who is pro-choice. The move took both conservatives and liberals by surprise in 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at alaskadispatch.com ...
I'm thinkin that was way, way down on her "to do" list...Sorry Sparky, but that was the lamest bash against Sarah Palin that I've ever read.......Sheesh!
Apparently Ol’ Sparky is too chickensh** to come back to this thread. What a shock.
C’mon, sparky. Come back and defend this thread. If you are man enough.
Bawk, bawk, bawk... chickensh**.
Whyn’t you consider not knocking down any good people on our side, which contributes to the ammo of the real enemy.
We may just be as ‘smaaarrt” as you are and can sort for ourselves.
No need to form circular firing squads.
Besides, if Palin doesn't, as you suggest, have a chance, why worry about tearing her down this early in the game?
You seem to think more like libTard: thinking you must do our thinking for us.
"WE STAND TOGETHER - OR WE FALL APART: mt (Get it?)
He has been brave enough to freepmail me.
Since nothing in it was the sort of private thing that belongs in freepmail, I told him to pound sand unless he’s going to address the issue in the thread where he has been libeling the governor.
Gov palin had little choice in this appointment. Both nominees were pro-choice.
You can support other candidates but when you attack ours don't cry if we defend her.
He did it again. I told him to come over here or cram it.
I’ll come back by later tonight to see if he found his gonads. If he’s really a man of deep principle as he claims, let’s see him defend his ideas.
Ol’ Sparky has claimed to me in freepmail that he is unable to post in the thread. I assume he means the mods have locked him out of it or have told him not to post here.
Ol’ Sparky is not being truthful if that is the case. Moderators have no power to limit access to a particular thread. It’s all or nothing. You either can post or you can’t.
I'm calling you out, Sparky. The Admin Mod says you're a liar. Get out from under your desk and stand up like a man here in your libel thread or go join DU and leave the conservatives alone.
Hmmmmmm...
I'm calling you out, Sparky. The Admin Mod says you're a liar. Get out from under your desk and stand up like a man here in your libel thread or go join DU and leave the conservatives alone.
Ol’ Sparky is not being truthful if that is the case. Moderators have no power to limit access to a particular thread. It’s all or nothing. You either can post or you can’t.
I'm calling you out, Sparky. The Admin Mod says you're a liar. Get out from under your desk and stand up like a man here in your libel thread or go join DU and leave the conservatives alone.
Regardless, the issue is NOT WHERE THE INFORMATION WAS POSTED BY WHO IS MAKING THE CLAIM. Frank Bailey, one of Palin's aides, is the source for the claims in the article. His remarks have been posted in the Anchorage Daily News.
If his comments are true about Palin, only an idiot wouldn't be concerned about her lack of principle and pettiness, ESPECIALLY WHEN POLLS SHOW BEHIND TENNESSEE AND ARIZONA.
Someone begs to differ:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2675706/posts?q=1&;page=101
To: Ol' Sparky; Admin Moderator
If you continue posting from liberal sources in an attempt to tear down our conservative candidates, your account here gets the zot.
Mods: you have the green light to take this turkey out at his next infraction.
120 posted on Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:02:37 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
Given the choice of believing the mods and believing you, I'm taking the mods every time. You have some credibility problems.
I'm tied up now, but I'll be back later to deal with your pathetic arguments. Expect napalm. While I'm gone, perhaps you could address my question from post 63 and the question dirtboy asked in 60 that prompted it. Surely you must have an answer...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.