Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: KarlInOhio
The “run to avoid a quorum” trick works if you can leave one person behind to force a roll call to check if a quorum is there. But what happens if the Republicans just don’t call a roll and assume that there are 20 Senators there and start voting on those things requiring a 3/5 quorum? Can they just deem there to be a quorum unless someone demands an actual roll call... but if there were a Dem there to do it they would have the 20 they need? What legal options do the Dems have if the Republicans just start voting things in 19-0 and “assume” that the Dem (there had to have been one somewhere) just abstained?

This is what I've been saying all along -- intentionally "miscount" the attendance and officially record it if there are no objections, then proceed with the established quorum.

The reason this wouldn't work in Indiana is that they have enough of a margin to leave a couple of folks behind to raise such objections.

54 posted on 02/28/2011 9:47:38 AM PST by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
This is what I've been saying all along -- intentionally "miscount" the attendance and officially record it if there are no objections, then proceed with the established quorum.

Why not? I remember brother Jim Wright pulling these kind of shenanigans as Speaker of the House back in the mid 80s.

55 posted on 02/28/2011 9:51:10 AM PST by Marathoner (Karl Marx loved government education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson