Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
Our law was founded on the principles of natural law, and as such all good and proper laws will comport with natural philosophy. Our own citizenship laws, as a reflection of natural laws, recognize citizenship at birth through both blood and soil - but has never established a criteria for both.

Vattel wasn't the first and last word on what “natural law” entails. He is not a secular saint with his words elevated to canon law beyond reproach abridgment or amendment.

And he never did use the term “natural born citizen”.

26 posted on 02/17/2011 3:22:33 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
Obviously Vattel didn't write his legal treatise to state "natural born Citizen." I mean, seriously. He wrote the thing in French, which reads:

Les naturels, ou indigenes, sont ceux qui sont nes dans le pays, de parens citoyens

Translated to English, gives this:

the natural, or indigenous, are those born in the country, parents who are citizens

37 posted on 02/17/2011 4:10:39 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson