Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: biggredd1
So far, have only been able to get 3 votes. This is big because there is a request for the two dufus broads appt by dunham to recuse themselves. If that happens you would then need 3 votes to proceed to a hearing!!!!

Doubly wrong:

(1) There have never been any votes to hear any eligibility case. All have been denied without comment and without dissent and, most tellingly, without any call for a response from the Government. (When a party asks the Supreme Court to review a case, the opposing party doesn't have to respond; if any of the 9 justices are possibly interested in hearing a case, the court will "call for a response." Obama and the DOJ have never responded to any cert petition in any of the eligibility cases, and the Court has never asked for a response.)

(2) Even if 2 justices are recused, it still takes 4 votes to grant cert.

46 posted on 02/17/2011 1:37:06 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

http://ammosmith.com/forum/club-house/kagan-was-representing-obama-citizenship/msg34618/?PHPSESSID=62413361dc92a095f8d8efb966cea7e0#msg34618

Topic: Kagan was representing Obama citizenship (Read 199 times)

tsxshooter
Expert Reloader

Posts: 684

YOu learn the most from the deer you miss

Kagan was representing Obama citizenship
« on: August 31, 2010, 04:07:32 PM »


Once again the Senate sold us out.
Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn’t it? The American people mean nothing any longer.. It’s all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there. We should be getting so sick of all of this nonsense.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!!

Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08-10382.htm


106 posted on 02/17/2011 2:27:17 PM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
I don't think there is any chance in hell that SCOTUS will touch this. If Obama were found to be ineligible, it would shake our country to it's core. If everything he has signed as president were suddenly invalid all the budget bills would be invalid. How would you resolve all the laws being invalid and all the money that has already been spent?

It could easily completely crash our economy, and devolve our government into utter chaos.

If several states legislate strict methods of proving eligibility to get on the ballot, then Obama would either have to prove eligibility in the next election, or come up with a reason to not run again.

However, I see absolutely no chance that if he isn't eligible that we will ever see it proved.

143 posted on 02/17/2011 3:52:53 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
( * (1) There have never been any votes to hear any eligibility case. All have been denied without comment and without dissent and, most tellingly, without any call for a response from the Government. (When a party asks the Supreme Court to review a case, the opposing party doesn't have to respond; if any of the 9 justices are possibly interested in hearing a case, the court will "call for a response." Obama and the DOJ have never responded to any cert petition in any of the eligibility cases, and the Court has never asked for a response.)

(2) Even if 2 justices are recused, it still takes 4 votes to grant cert. * )

Just curious, the WND article says this information was not made public, where did you get this information from ?
177 posted on 02/17/2011 5:12:26 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

you are also doubly wrong:

(1) Obama is not represented by the DOJ in this case (look at the previously posted docket).

(2) the ‘4’ votes is a custom, not a Rule of the court.


189 posted on 02/17/2011 5:50:22 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson