Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

That is complete and utter nonsense. “while not under oath”, why does someone need to be under oath to make a statement of pure fact? The fact is that the birth cerificate is on file with the State. The fact is that the Birthers like to treat this as a criminal or civil issue, even though they’ve been laughed out of every court they’ve went to (and wasn’t one of the head Birthers even fined for brining this nonsense before the court?), but they refuse to submit one scintilla of evidence that supports their claims or even their standing to bring a case.

“Until a court of law subpoena’s a copy of the original (or amended) long form...his true birth location (and age, and father/mother, etc) remains unverified.” Just like about every other president in the history of the country.

Finally, I find it laughably absurd that the statement of the officials in charge of the vital records is dismissed as “hearsay”, when the Birthers glom on to every single out-of-context or butchered remark made by Michelle Obama, the Kenyan ambassador, or even a Hollywood reporter (!) to further their cause.


234 posted on 02/18/2011 2:08:34 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: WinOne4TheGipper
How do you know for a fact that a long form birth certificate indicating he was born in 1961 in Hawaii to SADO and BO Sr is on file in Hawaii?

Because the politician in the picture above told you so?

237 posted on 02/18/2011 2:46:36 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson