Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential candidates won't need to show birth certificate for Arizona ballot
East Valley Tribune ^ | Howard Fischer

Posted on 02/15/2011 12:13:47 AM PST by blockhead51

It doesn't look like Barack Obama will need to get his original birth certificate to state officials to be on the presidential ballot in Arizona next year.

On a 5-3 vote Monday, the Senate Judiciary Committee defeated SB 1526 which would let Arizona impose its own requirements on what someone needs to prove before being on the ballot in the state. Three Republicans voted with the two Democrats on the panel to kill the plan offered by Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City.

Virtually identical legislation was introduced in the House in the form of HB 2544. But that measure has never gotten a hearing....

...Each of the measures would preclude a presidential candidate from appearing on the Arizona ballot unless party officials provided certain information to the Secretary of State's Office. That includes an original "long-form birth certificate" complete with the name of the hospital, attending physician and signatures of witnesses, to a sworn statement that the candidate had two parents who were citizens at the time of the child's birth.

"I think it's inappropriate for the state of Arizona to establish its own criteria for a federal office that goes beyond what the (U.S.) Constitution requires," said Sen. John McComish, R-Phoenix. And Sen. Adam Driggs, R-Phoenix, said this could create a situation where each of the 50 states would be screening presidential candidates using different standards.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: arizona; birthcertificate; certifigate; constitutionisdead; naturalborncitizen; obama; scumbag; sellouts; traitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2011 12:13:52 AM PST by blockhead51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

This is stunning news!! Did someone “get” to these three clowns?


2 posted on 02/15/2011 12:17:32 AM PST by blockhead51 (Oust the Evil Socialist Usurper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

Ahnold should run.


3 posted on 02/15/2011 12:19:16 AM PST by NoLibZone (Obama must be impeached and tried for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

You betcha!


4 posted on 02/15/2011 12:19:37 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

“...this could create a situation where each of the 50 states would be screening presidential candidates using different standards.”

####

So?

What is wrong with states’ rights anyway?


5 posted on 02/15/2011 12:20:09 AM PST by EyeGuy (Gimme Shelter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

Two republicans flipped, including Rick Martin a co sponsor. ?????


6 posted on 02/15/2011 12:22:17 AM PST by NoLibZone (Obama must be impeached and tried for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

I was under the impression that the bill only required potential candidates to verify that they were constitutionally eligible to hold the office for which they were aspiring to. The constitution grants states that authority. This smells really bad. Sovereign nation my a**.


7 posted on 02/15/2011 12:22:29 AM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

The Ruling Class shall not have to jump through bureaucratic hoops.


8 posted on 02/15/2011 12:23:00 AM PST by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: blockhead51
This is stunning news!! Did someone “get” to these three clowns?

Payoff or blackmail, one or the other.
Their reasoning for their vote is a crock of crap!

10 posted on 02/15/2011 12:24:51 AM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Two republicans flipped, including Rick Martin a co sponsor. ?????

Extortion?

11 posted on 02/15/2011 12:28:09 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51
Sen. John McComish, R-Phoenix. And Sen. Adam Driggs, R-Phoenix, said this could create a situation where each of the 50 states would be screening presidential candidates using different standards.

And you're worried about what other states do, why?
Pack of cowards...

12 posted on 02/15/2011 12:29:49 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51
Virtually identical legislation was introduced in the House in the form of HB 2544. But that measure has never gotten a hearing....

Time to move this one in the AZ House.

13 posted on 02/15/2011 12:30:30 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

“The Arizona Bill was defeated today with the help of three Republicans.”

I see primary challenges in their futures.

Frankly, I think this all comes down to the flak the state has taken over the illegal immigration vote they held last year.

They’ve allowed the LSM to turn them into weenies.


14 posted on 02/15/2011 12:32:29 AM PST by dixiechick2000 ("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

You know...I could run for President right now and not be worried about the Constitutional qualifications. They are solid, though getting the votes is an entirely different matter. ;o)

To your point...they should concern themselves with only their state and laws, and not worry about the requirement laws of the the other states.


15 posted on 02/15/2011 12:38:24 AM PST by dixiechick2000 ("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

Just a thought and I know it was a state matter, but I can almost see John McCain’s hand in this screwed up vote.........Just saying.


16 posted on 02/15/2011 12:38:57 AM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

It was a joke.

Since no one needs to prove constitutional eligibility, anyone can now run.

Even the age restriction is unenforceable.


17 posted on 02/15/2011 12:44:42 AM PST by NoLibZone (Obama must be impeached and tried for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

Orly Taitz must have testified before the committee.


18 posted on 02/15/2011 12:45:25 AM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51

Have you guys figured out yet that the Democratics and the Republicans are playing for the same team?


19 posted on 02/15/2011 12:46:51 AM PST by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blockhead51
""I think it's inappropriate for the state of Arizona to establish its own criteria for a federal office that goes beyond what the (U.S.) Constitution requires"

Someone this stupid should be removed.

20 posted on 02/15/2011 12:47:24 AM PST by NoLibZone (Obama must be impeached and tried for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson