Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Internet: 13,483,282 Newspaper: 0
Tech Chrunch ^ | February 11, 2011 | MG Siegler

Posted on 02/11/2011 5:19:14 PM PST by lbryce

A lot of people like to bitch and moan about how in the age of realtime information, the stream moves too quickly and as a result, there’s a decent chance of inaccurate news being spread. There’s no question it’s an issue, but with the situation in Egypt, we’re once again seeing the overwhelming upside of this realtime data spread that makes services like Twitter so powerful. And just look at the flip side.

The above image shows the frontpage of a newspaper that was delivered this morning. There are hundreds more like it around the country. Many, many people still get their news this way. They woke up this morning, opened the paper and got information that is so old that it’s now totally inaccurate. It’s ridiculous.

This has actually always been an issue — “In related news, DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN!,” quips Twitter’s Mark Trammell — but if radio hit the newspaper format over the head, the live, 24/7 television news channels drove a stake in its heart. And now the realtime web has pounded that stake deeper. With a sledgehammer. And then stuck a grenade in the mouth of the corpse.

I’m sorry, but there’s simply no role for the newspaper anymore. That’s not saying there’s no role for newspaper journalism, just the physical product itself. It’s a waste of paper, ink, and time. R.I.P.

(Excerpt) Read more at techcrunch.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: deadtreemedia; dinosaurwatch
I’m sorry, but there’s simply no role for the newspaper anymore. That’s not saying there’s no role for newspaper journalism, just the physical product itself. It’s a waste of paper, ink, and time. R.I.P.

That, my fellow FReepers, is the very distillation of all that is the future of newsprint.

The reality that the dead tree media is doomed becomes clearer with every newspaper deadline. The problem for the newsprint media is not only don't they get it, they don't want to get it. They don't want to get it because it means more than just about being profitable. It's about power, power and influence they had once wielded with impunity, to shape events, history in its own convoluted left wing, liberal image, the delusion in which their self-anointed status as guardian of truth, justice, watchdog of government in service to the people, as some divinely inspired purpose feeding into their sense of power and influence as justification for,of their very existence. This is why they can't seem to let go. Having been drunk on power throughout their heyday they're not prepared, able to deal with the sense of being sober.

1 posted on 02/11/2011 5:19:25 PM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I would most strongly disagree. It’s the best paper along with cedar kindling to get my wood stoves going. The NY Times works the best. I buy it oh once a month during the winter just to burn it.


2 posted on 02/11/2011 5:23:54 PM PST by mainevet (Get an M1911 or two or three or four)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

3 posted on 02/11/2011 5:25:02 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I keep noticing that while they tell us this is spontaneous, it could never be organized, then among themselves they comment on how well organized it is and what good organizers they are, but nobody wants to talk about who is organizing.

That is a good part of what is killing the dead tree press, and the alphabet networks too. They can’t seem to formulate obvious questions, forcing me to go find my own sources. Once I get in the habit of finding the information myself, they can’t give their product away anymore.

Literally. They have had people from our local paper out in front of the supermarket trying to give subscriptions away and no one will stop to talk to them.

The alphabet networks literally do give their product away too, and they keep dividing up a smaller and smaller market as fewer and fewer people want what they are giving away free.


4 posted on 02/11/2011 5:26:07 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

re: “RIP Newspapers”

Should that not be BIH?

Burn in H***


5 posted on 02/11/2011 5:29:44 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

No it lines the bottom of the bird cage. LOL


6 posted on 02/11/2011 5:31:08 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mainevet

Sunday Gazette is good for a month of BBQ in my charcoal chimney. LOL Don’t know what I’m going to do without it.


7 posted on 02/11/2011 5:34:02 PM PST by CIDKauf (No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Ministry of Truth bookmark.


8 posted on 02/11/2011 5:35:09 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This is a blog. Please post in the appropriate forum next time.


9 posted on 02/11/2011 5:42:14 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
There was an article in The Onion about this very issue a few months ago.

Boston Globe Tailors Print Edition For Three Remaining Subscribers

I'm not putting a link because The Onion did not want their stuff posted on FR. But the story was funny.

10 posted on 02/11/2011 5:43:09 PM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Simple economics 101

Supply and demand. If a customer cannot find what they are looking for in one place, they will find it somewhere else.

It is just how all things work.

There is nothing wrong with the printed media, just the content. There will always be a need for(unbiased) in-depth journalism.

11 posted on 02/11/2011 5:54:50 PM PST by BornToBeAmerican (Give me a hand up, not a hand out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Very well said...GG I use paper to start the fire in my burn barrel. Even the local news in the small towns around me are not worth reading anymore.


12 posted on 02/11/2011 8:01:13 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

Thank you very much for your kind words. :-)


13 posted on 02/11/2011 8:38:38 PM PST by lbryce (BHO:Satan's Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson