Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/05/2011 9:58:01 AM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: johncocktoasten; Maine Mariner; Candor7; FlashBack; athelass; Tina Grazier; exit82; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 02/05/2011 10:00:25 AM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
Well said....and spot on.

This is why so many conservatives admire and support Sarah Palin. I'm proud to be one of them.

3 posted on 02/05/2011 10:01:40 AM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Gingrich is hoarding mo’ money then others.
We have to outstomp the money and elect our baby Reaganette Sarah!


4 posted on 02/05/2011 10:06:30 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

5 posted on 02/05/2011 10:07:23 AM PST by uptoolate (Free at last, Free at last... (former Chicagoan, current Cowtown resident))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Palin also slyly mentioned how excited she was to ride horseback at the ranch... on a trail that was cleared by RR himself. I certainly got the metaphor.


6 posted on 02/05/2011 10:08:18 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

7 posted on 02/05/2011 10:11:34 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

The moment she announces, I’m in for as much as I can afford to give her campaign. She will have an astounding campaign fund and it will scare the RINOs and left to know how many Davids are here to fight their Goliath.


8 posted on 02/05/2011 10:13:35 AM PST by TheConservativeParty (President Sarah Louise Palin....Resistance is futile! Prepare to be liberated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Nice!


10 posted on 02/05/2011 10:16:43 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Domestically speaking, I don’t see much difference between Clinton and either Bush. Makes me sad to say it too.


12 posted on 02/05/2011 10:18:09 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Dittos.


13 posted on 02/05/2011 10:20:09 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
Palin versus the Bush-Clinton-Obama "hydra of big government"

This is a daunting task.

In the entire field, only Gov. Palin has either committed to that mission or has the stature to see it through.

16 posted on 02/05/2011 10:28:26 AM PST by Praxeologue (io)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
Nice job. I've got a lot of thoughts on this, but it goes back to your original premise that the Republicans hated Reagan, but loved the votes he got. The Pubbies shoved Bush the Elder on Reagan as VP. However, they tried to foist Ford on him as a co-President, with equal authority. They believed this was necessary to reign in Reagan's "dangerous tendencies." The Communists completely took over the Rats in 68, although it can easily be argued that FDR was very much a Communist sympathizer. Today, the big battle is in the Republican party.

The Tea Party delivered a ton of votes. The Republicans fired back at the Tea Party by supporting Rats or write ins, and followed with the "Date Night" at the State of the Union address. It was their way of saying, "Here inside the beltway, we're one big happy family. If you didn't go to Harvard and don't embrace the premise of a New World Order, we'll take your votes, but after that, the H### with you. We're dancing with the Rats who are more ideologically in agreement with us." Battle isn't over. 2012 will tell us if we can root out the One Worlder Big Government types from the Republican party.

17 posted on 02/05/2011 10:28:52 AM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
Thanks for this, BC...a GREAT takeaway from what she said.

I must admit I was so distracted by the terrible audio/video that I didn't listen as well as I should have, so it will he great to listen to it again or, better yet, read the transcript. BTW, if you find one, forward it to Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit, who had this to say:

I DIDN’T SEE SARAH PALIN’S SPEECH LAST NIGHT, but Randy Barnett saw it, and emailed: “I must admit it was an impressive speech. The first I have heard her give since she accepted the VP nomination, only much better. Reaganesque even.” When Sarah Palin is getting that kind of praise from Georgetown law professors, it suggests that there’s something missing from the narrative. Is there a transcript somewhere?

18 posted on 02/05/2011 10:31:04 AM PST by Al B. (Sarah Palin: "Buck up or stay in the truck.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
let me fix that for you

to the Clinton Administration (which was spawned by the missteps of the first Bush Ross Perot),
29 posted on 02/05/2011 11:09:38 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads


Today is a good day to die.
I didn't say for whom.

36 posted on 02/05/2011 11:19:05 AM PST by The Comedian (Muslim Brotherhood = A.N.S.W.E.R = Soros = Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Thanks for the analysis. Didn’t have a chance to see the speech, but I really like what Palin has to say about “compassionate” conservatism and big government.

Clearly, conservatism is favored by the majority of people, while liberalism is opposed by the majority.

The confusion comes because the values of liberalism (lying, cheating, stealing or policies of big government in general) are very often disguised as those of conservatism.

When this happens, people think they’re opposing conservatism but in fact what they oppose is liberalism disguised as conservatism. In the confusion, conservative candidates lose votes.


38 posted on 02/05/2011 11:22:01 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

She was way too ‘subtle’ last night.

It was easily the least of any of her speeches.


46 posted on 02/05/2011 12:17:25 PM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Excellent.


58 posted on 02/05/2011 1:56:30 PM PST by WesternOne (Western)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads

Very well done!

59 posted on 02/05/2011 2:05:37 PM PST by RedMDer (restoration of our honor, dignity, and freedoms will save America. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
Bravo! Well said!

I've hated that term "compassionate conservatism" since the first time I heard it. It's insulting, presumptuous, and condescending and reflects badly on whoever uses it.

65 posted on 02/05/2011 3:17:55 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson