Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

Yes, it says they saw that an original birth certificate was “on record.” This does NOT mean they pulled out an actual hard copy of a birth certificate. Thanks to databases, you can see what data is on record without actually going through the archives or hard copies of records. It’s like going to a Red Box and browsing the DVD menu. You can see what is in the machine without actually dispensing the DVD and looking at it. You know this and pretend otherwise.


94 posted on 02/04/2011 3:14:05 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Yes, it says they saw that an original birth certificate was “on record.” This does NOT mean they pulled out an actual hard copy of a birth certificate. Thanks to databases, you can see what data is on record without actually going through the archives or hard copies of records. It’s like going to a Red Box and browsing the DVD menu. You can see what is in the machine without actually dispensing the DVD and looking at it. You know this and pretend otherwise.


If anybody with the authority to rule on this issue really cared, they could depose Dr. Fukino or subpoena her to testify under oath and ask her directly what she meant by “on record.”
But no one with any authority seems to care: no District Attorney, no state Attorney General, no U.S. Attorney, and no Chair of a Congressional committee.


100 posted on 02/04/2011 4:10:15 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson