Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
I’m afraid whatever reference you’re making (presumably to the Hollywood ‘buzzed’ something or other about the stuttering king) is lost to me, because I’m not much interested in paying money to socialist nitwits - to watch what passes for movies anymore. They seem to get stupider all the time.
(though I do make the infrequent exception, if Angelina Jolie is in any way involved, yes my weakness...)
I mean how many different ways, can a small group of mean spirited marxists spin the same pro-homo propaganda over and over, and get paid $10 a ticket for the privilege?
No thanks. I’m not interesting in funding the enemy.
So you’re willing to buy into the Hollyweird meme. Lots do, so that’s cool. But ready to bash perhaps the single most inspiring conservative to appear on the American scene since Ronald Reagan, for being a real person?
Feh. Hopefully she doesn’t even think about changing.
Imho.
Great posting handle thought. :)
Nice discussing this with you.
Actually, The King’s Speech is a docu-drama about a historical event, and very well done. However, I share your general disdain for Hollywood.
As for Sarah, I wouldn’t say anything if I didn’t care about her future. The nation needs an American Margaret Thatcher.