“The argument of many birthers goes like this: the documents that would establish Obama’s natural born citizenship do not exist; therefore Obama is not eligible for the presidency; therefore honor and right and the Constitution require that we take steps to remove him from the presidency.
This, as I have said, is terribly premature. It is premature for the simple reason that most people have not kept up with this issue and are not aware of the facts. They are not aware that the documents that would establish Obama’s natural born status do not exist. Therefore what must be done at this stage is not to aim at the activist, disruptive, insanely divisive goal of removing a sitting president, but rather to inform and persuade people of the FACTS that have come to light.
And here is what has come to light. As a result of Gov. Abercrombie’s lurching behavior and statements, we now know with virtually absolute certainty that Obama’s birth certificate (the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate) does not exist in the state of Hawaii records. How do we know this? We know it because in December Abercrombie noisily announced his intention of finding and releasing Obama’s birth certificate. Then he immediately went silent on the issue for several weeks. Then, at the end of a newspaper interview on political matters, a reporter asked him how the search for the birth certificate was going, and the governor mentioned some “recording” he had found “written down” in the state records. He didn’t mention the birth certificate. If he had found the birth certificate, he would have said so. Then a day or two later the governor announced that he was terminating his search for the birth certificate because Obama had not given his consent for the birth certificate to be released. Obviously that last announcement—that the birth certificate could not be released—contradicted the governor’s inadvertent confession to the reporter that the birth certificate could not be found.
If the governor of Hawaii, with all the apparatus of the state government at his fingertips, cannot find Obama’s birth certificate in the records of the state of which he is the governor, then we can take it as an established FACT that the birth certificate does not exist. Or, if it ever did exist, that it has been removed and hidden. Either way, there is no official record showing the truth about Obama’s birth.
This is the new information that most people are not aware of, and that we birthers need to spread. What we need to spread is not a call for Obama to be removed from office, a call which immediately results in birthers being dismissed as mere enemies of Obama, but the FACT that Obama’s birth certificate does not exist in the files of the state of Hawaii, that there is no official record of the time and place of Obama’s birth.
The ascertainment of that fact leads to certain conclusions:
1. The people who have been doubting the official story all along, the rational birthers (I do not speak here of the irrational birthers), have been right.
2. The people who have been mocking and dismissing the birthers have been wrong.
3. Barack Obama has been misstating and concealing the truth of the circumstances of his birth.
4. Everyone who has contemptuously dismissed all questions about Obama’s birth have been, willingly or not, Obama’s accessories in this concealment.
We don’t need to go to the next step, that Obama is therefore ineligible for the presidency and should be removed. Shifting the discussion to those extremely controversial assertions will distract attention from the facts which have been established. Let other people draw those conclusions. All we need to do is get people to see the FACT that contrary to what the entire media and official world have been telling us, there is no official record of Obama’s birth in Hawaii. Once that fact sinks into the public consciousness, then the discussion will be ready to move on to the next stage. But to try to move to the next stage when most people have not absorbed that fact, is premature and counterproductive.”
This interview is stunning. You can hear the shock in the voices of the two DJs.
I thought the former governor, Republican Lisa Lingle, had seen and vouched for the existence of the birth certificate.
If the actual birth certificate can’t be obtained, this has got to present a rather prickly situation for 0bama and the dems, even if they’re not admitting it yet.
How can that COLB be considered valid if there’s no base document from which to draw the information?
I believe this is what is called a “blue dress” moment.
This would put Nancy Pelosi on the spot! She produced documents certifying Obama as being eligible according to the Constitution to run for President!
50 copies of the document to the States!
How did she certify him with no BC?
In a subsequent interview, Mike Evans makes it clear he has not spoken to Neil Abercrombie since the CSPAN interview they did together immediately after the Obama inauguration. Mike Evans was basing his "no birth certificate" comment on a story he read elsewhere. He has no insider info. Evans is disputing his own words.
Barry is a fraud?....who knew?
If you're running the democrat party and you can see where the eligibility issue is going, you're probably trying to come up with a way to distance yourself from obama and somehow save the party.
If, before the fan gets dirty, you can get out in front of the BC issue in such a way as to show that you were trying to do the right thing but were stopped by the WH, you almost look like a whistle-blower.
And, if you then officially learn that you were fooled by obama himself, along with everyone else...well, might be a way to make the best of a very bad situation, even save yourself and the party. While saving the Constitution and country. The game is afoot.
Evans is now back tracking, claiming he never spoke to Abercrombie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lkYK_QcqHY