Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yet_Again

“If her rebuttal is unremarkable or poor then - as in the case of Jindal - her 2012 run is over before it starts”

That’s an exaggeration. If Jindal’s out of the big picture, it’s because of Jindal as a whole. I don’t care how bad his reception at the time was, neither in the beltway nor the blogosphere. People forget, and regular people never cared, anyway.

Bill Clinton did one of those rebuttal things some year and in my opinion failed. By the time he won the Democratic nomination he came from the back of the pack, after surviving a series of scandals and surprising absolutely everyone. Someone or other after Jindal’s fizzle tried to present Clinton’s long-ago rebuttal as a star-making turn. But that was revisionist nonsense. Nobody cared then, nobody cared afterwards. He became the Bill Clinton we know in the ‘92 primary, not before.


45 posted on 01/25/2011 11:51:10 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

VOTE WITH YOUR REMOTE !!!!


47 posted on 01/25/2011 11:51:55 AM PST by Reagan69 (I went to a shooting-victims' memorial service and all I got was a lousy T-shirt !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson