Replies

In August, 2008, just two months before the election, the Democrat Party of Hawaii’s (DPH) chairman, Brian Schatz, had already refused to include legally required, explicit language in its sworn Official Certification of Nomination (OCON) that Barack Obama was qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The DPH's OCON document was allegedly submitted to the Hawaiian Election's office between August 27th and September 5th, 2008.

Yes that's a fact. Hawaii refuse to certify Obama Constitutionally eligible as president. Then comes Nancy Pelosi to Obama's rescue to comply with Hawaiian law:

The evidence:

Hawaiian Law Revised Statutes 11-113 (Presidential Ballots). The Hawaiian DNC state party left out for Obama's certification that he is qualified under the US Constitutional, which is highlighted in the letter below.

Here is the Hawaiian DNC certification for Obama, which is missing the qualification under the US Constitution and for the state of Hawaii.

John Kerry's 2004 Hawaiian party DNC Certification. Notice that Kerry is qualified under the US Constitutional and for the state of Hawaii.

Al Gore's 2000 Hawaiian DNC party certification. You will also notice that he fully complies with Hawaiian Revised Statutes 11-113.

Enter Nancy Pelosi signed statement... because Hawaii did not fully certify Barack Hussein Obama. Pelosi signs the statement to fulfill the required Hawaiian law under Revised Statutes 11-113.

But Pelosi attempted some legal jujitsu to not be legally caught holding the poop bag when and if this con-game blows up in their collective faces.

This document is the legally completed DNC Obama certification.

And the DNC Obama certification document to satisfy Hawaiian law on the left below:

Excellent post

I would pay to send it to 100,000,000 Americans but doubt most would read or understand it ...

What can we, here at FR, do to stop this fraud ?

This is really strange. Why submit anything at all? It's null and void.