Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
In the original specs they put out for bids was the concept of commonality - the Navy and Air Force variants were to be nearly identical, generating cost savings in spare parts, tooling, training of the mechanics, as well as pilot training.

Even the Marine variant, with its STO/VL equipment, was to share around 60% of components with the other models.

Making the F-35 with two different engines kind of defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

8 posted on 01/22/2011 9:01:37 PM PST by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ZOOKER

This was a Democratic baby. The members of the Democratic HASC was pushing this program.


9 posted on 01/22/2011 9:03:58 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ZOOKER
Making the F-35 with two different engines kind of defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

The F135 and F136 are to share common mounting points and electrical, hydraulic, and fuel connections, to be completely interchangeable.

15 posted on 01/23/2011 2:52:01 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson