To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
LOL, Angry tone comes from the right ???
2 posted on
01/19/2011 7:02:03 AM PST by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
This will be the lead story on MSM tonight on the media’s abrasive language! lol, sure it will...
3 posted on
01/19/2011 7:04:02 AM PST by
choctaw man
(Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
I love how libs whenever referring to Rush, continue to make it sound like Rush weighs 1000lbs. They obviously haven’t seen how much weight Rush has lost.
8 posted on
01/19/2011 7:13:25 AM PST by
LoneStarGI
(Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Indeed, liberals, in general, deserve the biggest, loudest STFU in the history of mankind.
10 posted on
01/19/2011 7:14:40 AM PST by
Pravious
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Liberals have a complex of suppressed violent thoughts. Every now and then, it gets out of control.
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
libtard = lying hypocrite
13 posted on
01/19/2011 7:18:55 AM PST by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
There are laws about making terrorist threats. Why are lib talk show hosts immune?
15 posted on
01/19/2011 7:24:48 AM PST by
DManA
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
It's not about civility. What the libs are upset over is that conservative ideology is based on fact and therefor succeeds. This is evident in just about any forum or media source.
Liberal ideology is based on emotional concepts and the more removed from fact the better. In order to succeed at getting their message out they have to lie, mis-speak, cheat, steal, or engage in any ends justify means covert ops. The problem is that lies will not support lies. Every one of their "successes" is based on a soon to be realized failure. They know it and it terrifies them. As these failures rise up they label them as a product of unfairness, or that they came about from mean spirited conservatism run amok.
They want their failed agenda to be awarded the same success, even though it's based on false foundation. They want their game handicapped to be fair.
I don't mean to sound cruel, but it's like conservatism and liberalism go to the olympics. The liberals want to compete, but do not have the skillsets or physical ability to overcome their opponents. The answer in their mind is that they need the Special Olympics to be rebranded for them, announced and televised as though it was the same event.
It's just cruel, unfair, and uncivil to compete on the same playing field.
17 posted on
01/19/2011 7:26:04 AM PST by
blackdog
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Civility, according to the Hard Left: Shut your pieholes and do as you’re told, (censored) conservatards.
18 posted on
01/19/2011 7:26:46 AM PST by
Fred Hayek
(FUBO! I salute you with the soles of my shoes.)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
If this story ever gets aired on Rush's own radio show or gets mentioned on Hannity on the Fox News Network, Malloy will wonder what hit him....
21 posted on
01/19/2011 7:36:12 AM PST by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Ugly, hateful individual.
22 posted on
01/19/2011 7:36:31 AM PST by
cubreporter
(Rush Limbaugh...Man of all the years. Trust Rush he stands for America.)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
And BTW, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Seann Hannity, Newt Gingrich, Dennis Miller, Anne Coulter, et,al..... Have to run their races with a backpack of rocks strapped to their backs and in bare feet over broken glass to be civil and fair.
Regulations are on the way to make sure.
23 posted on
01/19/2011 7:38:10 AM PST by
blackdog
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Hey Mike....Just name a certain part of the male anatomy Rush and go to town!!!!!
24 posted on
01/19/2011 7:38:45 AM PST by
4yearlurker
(I can't afford anymore hope and change!!!!)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Not only Malloy, Schultz and other lib yakkers...
How about this from communist cartoonist Ted Rall (”Lets Kill Some Christians and Tea Partiers”):
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=18820
25 posted on
01/19/2011 7:49:44 AM PST by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
The fact of the matter is that he said he simply wanted to choke him, not choke him to death, so there simply is no comparison to be made.
/liberal rationalization
28 posted on
01/19/2011 8:26:56 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Choking Rushbo is called Net Neutrality by the Liberals.
29 posted on
01/19/2011 8:27:09 AM PST by
Rappini
("Pro deo et Patria.)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv
Malloy is a wannabe shock jock. That is the kindest thing one could gather from even a short listen to his extravagant raving.
Listening to him makes me fell dirty
30 posted on
01/19/2011 8:27:55 AM PST by
don-o
(He will not share His glory; and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
To: blog.Eyeblast.tv

here's a picture of the tough guy (snicker)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson