Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

Was this request denied by the judge on 11 Jan 2011?


18 posted on 01/18/2011 1:56:19 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: deport
Not this affidavit, but the hearing on 1/11/2011.
From the affidavit: ("Plaintiff Witnessat the January 11, 2011 Hearing on the Notice of Motion for AmendedComplaint in Strunk v Paterson et al . New York State Supreme CourtKings County Index No.: 29642-08"):
16. That the Court found that there were so many procedural questions that would otherwise end up in Appellate Court anyway in that the best way to expedite the matter of importance requires Plaintiff to proceed as quickly as possible and therefore entered an order (see Exhibit C):
"The motion for leave having come on to be heard, and the Court having heard plaintiff in support thereof, and the Attorney General's Office in opposition there to, NOW, it is hereby ORDERED, that the motion is denied in entirety."

32 posted on 01/18/2011 2:44:02 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson