It doesn’t get more clear. We must, in time, bring every legislator to account for failing his/her oath to The Constitution.
Which is why now Speaker Boehner will not touch it. He was a memeber of the 111th Congress that allowed this usurpation to take place, along with other members such as Darrell Issa. New arrivals on the scene have no such baggage, but of course are outgunned by the established members.
So how to move forward? With the recent memory of ACORN still relatively fresh in our minds and the shenanigans in the dem primaries in 2008 by Obama’s crew against Hillary, voting integrity should be the number one goal. Everyone should be for integrity of the vote, should they not?
States need to assert their rights with shoring up loopholes that allowed unqualified candidates, regardless of party, to get on their ballots.
And a poster child for this would be Hawaii. Pen Johannson, in his blog post from January 17th at The Daily Pen http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/ lists specific questions for Congress. Since Congress is reluctant to investigate, perhaps Attorney Generals of the various States should pose these questions to officials in Hawaii (or in their own states for that matter) as I doubt the newly elected Governor as well as the other HI state officials identified in the blogpost could be trusted to get to the truth. Maybe it’s time to forward this information to our respective Attorney Generals in the name of ensuring future vote integrity.
QUESTIONS FOR CONGRESS
QUESTION 1: Why, after including the legally required language for previous Democratic candidates in elections past, did chairperson, Brian Schatz and the Democrat Party of Hawaii, refuse to include the legally required language upon submitting it for the approval of that state party’s 2008 Official Certification of Nomination when they submitted it to Kevin B. Cronin and the Hawaiian Election Commission?
QUESTION 2: Did Kevin Cronin, Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer in 2008, approve the placement of Barack Obama’s name on the presidential ballot for the 2008 federal election, in spite of the fact that explicit language stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to run for president was omitted from the Official Certification of Nomination submitted by the Democrat Party of Hawaii?
QUESTION 3: Did Kevin Cronin, Chief Elections Officer, in coordination with the Hawaiian Election Commission, and HRS 11-113 (1)(d), notify Barack Obama in writing, of his eligibility or disqualification for placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot and what date did he provide this notification?
QUESTION 4: If a notice of disqualification was sent to Obama, upon receiving this notice from the Hawaiian Elections Commission, did Barack Obama file a request, per HRS 11-113 (1)(e), in writing to Mr. Cronin and what date did he submit this request?
QUESTION 5: Did Cronin schedule Obama to a hearing and what date was this hearing scheduled?
QUESTION 6: Where was Obama between October 20th and 24th, 2008?
QUESTION 7: Was Obama present in Hawaii during the time when a hearing was conducted with the Hawaiian Elections Commission regarding his disqualification from the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot?
QUESTION 8: Why did the Democratic National Committee author two separate Official Certifications of Nomination for Barack Obama, sending one version to Hawaii but not the other 49 states?
QUESTION 9: Did The DNC send two separate versions of its OCON to the Hawaiian Election Commission, and if so, why did it do this?
QUESTION 10: What secret evidence, which was obviously not accessible to the Democrat Party of Hawaii (the very state Obama was born in), did Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Committee acquire to determine Barack Obama’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution and, thereby, include such language in its OCON?
QUESTION 11: When it was determined that the state and national party authorities of the Democratic Party did not agree on the status of Barack Obama’s eligibility, did the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii, Kevin Cronin, determine to include Obama on the Hawaii presidential election ballot with authority provided by HRS 11-113(b).
QUESTION 12: What documented evidence was used by the DNC, which was not available to the Democrat Party of Hawaii, to determine that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution?
Which is why now Speaker Boehner will not touch it. He was a memeber of the 111th Congress that allowed this usurpation to take place, along with other members such as Darrell Issa. New arrivals on the scene have no such baggage, but of course are outgunned by the established members.
----------------------------------------
Exactly. They (Boehner, Issa, etc) would be inviting their own demise by opening up any investigations on how they were complicit in helping to allow a born British subject to be certified eligible as our Commander in Chief of the armed forces while they were in a position to...at the very least, question it.
For that reason, essentially like taking the 5th so as to not "incriminate" themselves, they will continue to excuse it away by saying things like it's not their committee's job or they are just fine with an alleged jpeg of the short form on the WWW of the born British subject.
If any movement on this is to happen on Capital Hill, it's going to have to come from the freshman who were not involved with the 111th Congress.