Posted on 01/15/2011 10:25:37 AM PST by MostlyAnti-Lib
Some say Social Security will be solvent for decades to come. Others say the Social Security fund is nothing but a bunch of IOUs. Whos lying to us? Are they all lying to us?
I contend that, in varying degrees, they all are.
They treat us like school children. They answer our questions with half-truths and little white lies, because, to quote Jack Nicholson, We cant handle the truth!
On Neil Cavutos Your World recently, Nancy Altman, the Co-director of Social Security Works, stated that there is plenty of money available to fund Social Security for many years to come, and Cavuto rebutted with, in so many words, No there isnt.
And that was it. End of discussion. Cut to a commercial.
Nobody howled, Well, thats a darned lie!. Nobody whipped out a stack of evidence substantiating their claim. The viewer was left sitting there, open-mouthed, wondering, What did I just see?
Back in 2003, when the Bush administration questioned the management of Fannie and Freddie, Barney Frank said, I do not think we are facing any kind of a crisis. In 2008, after the S.S. Fannie and Freddie had hit the sand big time and the country had damn near gone into the dumper, good ol Barney was singing quite a different song, but he, Chris Dodd, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick and others came out smelling like a rose (while surreptitiously stuffing millions of dollars in their pockets), while the beleaguered taxpayers pondered, What the hell just happened?
The Federal Reserve, with Ben Bernanke at the helm, operates in some kind of Twilight Zone where there is no congressional oversight and no one dares to question the decrees that are formulated behind the closed doors of that august office.
Of course, the manipulation of interest rates by the Fed were instrumental in the housing meltdown, and the current quantitative easing and other financial sleight-of-hand measures apparently have unintended consequences that leave the American people asking, in disbelief, Are they trying to destroy us?
The incumbent crop of politicians (on both sides of the aisle) certainly appear to be a lost cause, but perhaps we can put pressure to bear on the newly-elected freshmen to live up to their campaign rhetoric and drain the swamp (that Nancy Pelosi deepened and made ever more murky) and ask the hard questions that have gone unanswered for decades.
Like Pandora’s box, the only thing left in the “SS lockbox” is `Hope’ (and handful of change).
I don’t understand. Who is trying to pulling wool. What do you think is a lie here?
The USG will have to create new debt to redeem to the SSTF IOUs. That is the problem.
The alternative is to raise taxes. There would be a revolt if taxes were raised to pay for the benefits in just a few years.
And of course the third alternative would be to cut benefits to the point where tax payers are willing to assume the burden.
I agree that we are at the edge of what we can borrow without completely collapsing the system.
Looks like to me practically speaking we are going to have to cut benefits.
What politicians would love to do is let inflation do the dirty work - if COLAs don’t keep up with inflation, it amounts to negative compounding, gradually reducing the real cost of entitlement benefits.
According to the 2010 Trustees report, the Social Security trust funds will have an annual surplus of $77 billion in 2010.
According to news reports, the system was in the red in 2010.
There was a deficit this year. Probably next year too. Then they expect a surplus for a while. Then, the deluge.
Most Americans don't have a clue as to how much trouble we are in. We are bankrupt and there is no way to get out of our predicament without a lot of pain. It is going to be terrible.
You pay your FICA.
Congress spends it funding current retirees and any ecess funds are spent on beetle dung research.
Congress issues an IOU to the SS Trust Fund for the amount they spent on beetle dung research and other things not related to Social Security.
The IOU, in the form of a worthless bond, is worthless.
Your SS contributions are not yours. If you die the money you contributed goes down the rat hole. Your loved ones get nothing, nobody passes go.
Rinse and repeat until the scheme falls under it's own weight.
It is simplicity in itself. I think people over think it because they can’t believe it can be that simple.
Do most British evangelicals say that Jesus is the only road to God?
This was all explained to me when I was 18 (I’m 56 now). It’s not like we just woke up this morning and discovered this mess. So I never expected to see any benefits. But if the whole economy collapses any advantage I might have had from that early understanding will be moot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.