Fantasywriter to jamese777
You are the one who said to be wary of the BC issue because it was started by Dems. You said it could be an Obama ‘deflection’. You failed to mention that the two Dems who started it were virulently anti-Obama. Sorry, jamese; I don’t even read your posts any more. You are either too uninformed or too disinguous to interest me.
What I would like is an honest public debate on Obama’s eligibility. I believe that a grand jury investigation with subpoena power and sworn expert testimony is the best way to achieve that. I also believe that a state or federal (congressional) legislative committee could do the job.
When one side or the other distorts reality, it ends up hurting their argument and moves us all farther away from finally resolving this issue through an honest, open debate. Distorting or misinterpreting what Judge Lind actually said is such an occurrence.
“...an embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements...” is a long way from “President Obama would be embarrassed.”
When the “Obama is ineligible” side gets it wrong, it allows the “Obama is eligible” side to minimize and ridicule the entire issue.
I could care less if you read my posts. I don’t post to or for any one person.
See post 136.
Sure you do Obot. All you do is cut and paste BS ad nauseam.