You are too kind.
I just read them when someone quotes or posts a link. Others read more often.
I already don’t do a lot of stuff I should do beacuse of FR...
Well this is the first time I’ve ever read a Hillbuzz discussion of the BC. I found it interesting because the OP, like me, is fixated on why Lakin’s judge called Obama’s BC “embarrassing”. That raises so many questions. How does she know it’s ‘embarrassing’? Did she see it? Did she take someone’s word for it? Did the someone tell her the truth or lie? Most importantly, what does ‘embarrassing’ mean? Presumably she doesn’t think the BC says Obama was born in Africa; that was be a sight more than ‘embarrassing’.
So anyway, the judge must think, as the Hillbuzzer speculates, (1) Obama is listed as Caucasian [the HB guy said, ‘Caucasian-Arab’, which frankly I just don’t see]; (2) the original BC is in fact sealed, as it should be, and the only one available lists “Barry Soetero” - which as the HB guy meticulously details from a legal and factual POV, it would do immediately upon Obama’s adoption, or (3) it lists a different father or no father at all.
As I said, far more questions than answers. The most important of which, in this context [though not in the larger context, of course] being, why DID the judge select that particular word, ‘embarrassing’? And why did she use it as a pretext to keep the BC hidden???