[edge919]

I’m of the opinion that the birth notices are not primary evidence. The actual birth records at the Hawaii Department of Health are primary evidence and birth records are self-authenticating documents under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures. Newspaper birth notices are corroborating evidence.

And it's no coincidence that none of this 'evidence,' primary or so-called corroborating has ever been presented in a court of law.

[Hotlanta Mike]

Or as hard copies. We only see digital copies...

[jamese777]

And it’s no coincidence that none of this ‘evidence,’ primary or so-called corroborating has ever been presented in a court of law.

---

And that’s because birther attorneys are too inept to put up a plaintiff with standing to sue and because no prosecuting attorney in the nation has initiated a Grand Jury investigation of Obama’s eligibility. And finally, there has been no state or federal legislative investigation.

Unfortunately for birthers, they have been trying to play in the “World Series” of the legal world with “Little League” level lawyers. Not one “major league, all-star” quality conservative constitutional attorney has represented any plaintiff in 90 Obama eligibility suits.

With “major league” quality attorneys comes the ability to present to a court plaintiffs who will be granted standing to sue.