To: cripplecreek
He then called it a slave supporting document that only the courts had corrected. Stephen must not be familiar with how The Constitution is amended.
9 posted on
01/06/2011 7:41:55 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Texas Eagle
Stephen Cohen needs to read Fredrick Douglas. Douglas belived the constitution to be a slavery supporting document till he read it in depth. Then he changed his view of it and recognized it as an anti slavery document.
13 posted on
01/06/2011 7:49:21 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: Texas Eagle
Stephen must not be familiar with how The Constitution is amended. When they get to Article V, whoever is reading it should start with "Mr. Cohen, please pay attention."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson