Well, for one thing, the Food Stamps program doesn’t require you to pay back what you used once you move up the economic ladder.
What other errors of fact are there?
Besides, as far as I can tell, the Libs want people dependent on them, not making free choices. That kills the idea right there.
There is no error, other than that other people than Forbes have even suggested that those using HC pay back at least a part of what they owe when they rise up the economic ladder. They haven’t suggested the same thing for use of the food stamp program. You conflated the two.
But how could libs be against this HC program suggested by Forbes as it would be just like the food stamp program, given that no one is forced to sign up for food stamps and given that Dems have never suggested that people be forced to sign up for food stamps - even if they are eligible for them?