Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: opentalk
Right. As a tactic, I think it is counterproductive. I think the far more productive angle is to focus on his substantive views (especially) and personal history as an adult, which provide a very strong indication that he is of a Marxist bent and opposes the entire concpet of American Exceptionalism.

I've handled plenty of cases where I've ditched a weaker argument so as not to detract from the appeal of an argument much more likely to succeed. From what is being argued in this thread, all nine members of the Supreme Court, including Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, and Alito, and the entire Republican contingent of the U.S. Congress, is complicit in covering up this birth issue despite people banging on it for years.

At some point, if you can't take the hill with a frontal assault, you need to consider flanking maneuvers rather than giving your opponent propaganda victories.

621 posted on 01/07/2011 10:30:45 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin
It is bigger than just the birth certificate for me. There is not an organized "birther" group. Gut instinct is -- deception and fraud. Shutting up is not the answer.

The call for transparency can be done by may means.

Transparency is what Obama campaigned on. Asking for accountability from a politician is not unreasonable especially when you suspect a con. Suggest you stop using the Birther label toward anyone who questions why the records are being kept off limits to the public.

625 posted on 01/07/2011 10:48:59 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson