[Red Steel]

Wow. Excellent citation. I was not aware of that, but that would genuinely call into question whether anchor babies are Constitutional.

Here's the link and cited webpage for future use. :-)

http://supreme.justia.com/us/83/36/case.html

The 1872 SCOTUS opinion doesn't nearly get cited enough against the Bots.

Those 1872 Supreme Court jurists could have easily walked across the street in person to the Capital building and asked 14th Amendment framers so what did you guys mean by the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"? It was that simple.

[Fantasywriter]

Wow—that IS a good citation! Bookmarking the link; thank you!

[DJ MacWoW]

I quit arguing with Bots. One of the Founding Fathers could stand in front of them and tell them that Bam isn’t eligible and they’d argue it.