[daisy mae for the usa]

You are avoiding my question which ended my last post. I think I have been clear on where I stand. You have been asked if people born on American soil to one or two NON-citizen parents SHOULD, repeat SHOULD, not -can- but SHOULD, be allowed to occupy the office of the Presidency. Will you answer this question?

But to be very clear, I agree with fantasywriter, the 14th amendment addresses citizenship in general but not the term “Natural Born Citizen” in particular used in reference to the presidency.

I also agree with you in that the way things currently stand, wording can be “CONSTRUED” to be vague. Cultural Marxists will seek to build on vagueness to further the watering down of established ideas. You aren’t a cultural marxist are you?

Please, in your next response, address the end question of my last post.

[daisy mae for the usa]

I’m sorry, I should have pinged you for #560 since I mentioned your name. Please accept my apology for the etiquette breach.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

You are avoiding my question which ended my last post. I think I have been clear on where I stand. You have been asked if people born on American soil to one or two NON-citizen parents SHOULD, repeat SHOULD, not -can- but SHOULD, be allowed to occupy the office of the Presidency. Will you answer this question? I wasn't avoiding your question. I thought we were discussing what the Constitution actually says, not what I wish it said. But to answer you question, I have't given it much thought, but my inclination is to say that no, I don't.

Jus tout of curiosity, how about a someone born to two U.S. citizens overseas? Should they be permitted to become President?