Ping
Thank you for the Ping.
In the book, I maintain that the adoption of Warfare is what created Humans. It made us as great as we are today, because it selected for intelligence, loyalty, honor, teamwork, creativity, adaptability - every great aspect we embody. If we could travel the universe, and find other intelligent, highly advanced species, they would be Warrior species as well. In this scheme, the Liberal Anticompetitor is an evolutionarily programmed traitor/appeaser, as a means of avoiding free competition in battle, which childhood experiences indicate to them, they would likely lose. They adopt this behavior as a means of trying to win Darwinian advantage without competing freely. However, I point out, this is a dangerous road to travel, especially when thwarting group competition (warfare) through treason. If their own society’s Competitors catch on that the Appeaser is trying to bring foreign Hordes in to oppress all free competition and thwart the indigenous Competitor, the Appeaser will likely be killed by his own people. As I point out, if a soldier catches an enemy soldier trying to kill him in battle, the enemy soldier will be treated with respect, and taken prisoner. Let the soldier catch a traitor passing a slip of paper to the enemy, however, and the traitor will be executed. As Competitors, Warriors are programmed to eradicate Anticompetitors where they find them, and this is how it manifests.
Thus in the section on psychologically manipulating Liberals, I maintain one of the psychological wedges which affects Liberals, but not Conservatives, is being potentially alienated from their peers. It affects them in a way we cannot imagine, as when the populace was about to turn on the Appeaser, they were about to die. Let me put a Black Mamba between your sheets, and you try to go to bed. Pull back the sheets. See that snake about to bite you, and kill you? That’s how a Liberal feels if the populace is about to turn on them. They evolved to sense it, and feel a panic we cannot feel. I point out that Conservatives are always Conservatives, and proud of it, whether we are winning elections, or losing elections. Our values guide us. Let Liberals find themselves on the outside, however, and suddenly, they are all denying they are Liberal, and changing their ideology’s name to “Progressive.” Or, once a War is being won, the Antiwar Liberals will retreat from the landscape, and disappear. They are not suddenly pro-war. They are just picking up on cues which evolution designed them to pick up on, as a means of furthering their own survival. These cues drive them to hide.
The Liberal will prove to be acutely sensitive to any cue which might indicate that their own population is about to turn on them. Evolution programmed them this way, so they might best function within their society walking the fine line of a treasonous subversive. I even show where a Liberal Appeaser speaks in an interview of how, after being castigated daily in a court trial, he fell apart mentally and could not function. In his words, he was not just hopeless, he was copeless. This was a guy who found his own son’s dead body, and apparently experienced no such effect from that. But let a lawyer tell a jury he’s a bad person, and he falls apart.
The important take home point is to never debate a Liberal on facts, or seek to educate them. Facts and truth mean nothing to them, as they are merely executing an imbued behavioral drive to betray, appease, and stifle free competition. Bring up the contemptible urges underlying their position, and castigate them in front of their peers. They will rapidly retreat from the debate, as that is a programmed reflex for them, and this will leave Conservatives to claim control.