Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
IMHO, OneWingedShark and you are both correct, although a very basic "regular army" was being built up, most of the soldiers during the earlier "Indian wars" were Militia... The "standing army" as we see now was built up during and after the civil war, the mass of the "army" before then was a combination of State and "private" Militia's that were integrated and molded into an army.

But the founders were very clear, they feared a "standing army" as they new that once removed from the hands of "the people" it could be a tool used by a tyrannical government to subjugate its people, that is why they almost always referenced citizen militia's when talking about the DEFENSE of the states and the new Federal State.

15 posted on 12/30/2010 3:28:58 AM PST by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: AvOrdVet

We had militias then, we have militias now, we had a professional military then, we have one now.

What about our standing Navy and Air Force, are they part of this disarmament?


19 posted on 12/30/2010 10:02:33 AM PST by ansel12 ( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson