[wardaddy]

passive aggressive little gal ain’t ya?

come on rude and recoil when ya get bit back...poor wuttle ting

I’ve watched you work here.....slamming anyone not at your level of Sarah admiration like that makes one unfit for this forum...you are doing Sarah no favors dear.

[SoConPubbie]

passive aggressive little gal ain’t ya?

come on rude and recoil when ya get bit back...poor wuttle ting

I’ve watched you work here.....slamming anyone not at your level of Sarah admiration like that makes one unfit for this forum...you are doing Sarah no favors dear.

I take it my original post must have really hit home for you to be acting like such a little girl.

[SoConPubbie]

I’ve watched you work here.....slamming anyone not at your level of Sarah admiration like that makes one unfit for this forum...you are doing Sarah no favors dear.

The only one not doing Sarah any favors are people damning her with faint praise suggesting she would be better as head of the RNC, or any other GOP organization.

By implication, all you are saying is that she is not capable of being POTUS. In effect you are siding with the PDS'ers no matter how much you state you support her.

So, what's your unsupportable reason for suggesting she should go for head of the RNC, or any other GOP organization?

1. She's not ready to be POTUS?
2. She's weak on Foreign Policy?
3. The Press will/has destroyed her?
3. She's not conservative enough?

Try to be a mature adult and respond without characterizing me as a Palin Cult member or someother pejorative term?

In other words, don't be a hypocrite. 2.