Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murkowski Only "Repub" that Voted for DADT Repeal, Tax Compromise, New START, and DREAM Act Cloture
Pundit Press ^ | 12/23/10 | Aurelius

Posted on 12/23/2010 8:15:33 PM PST by therightliveswithus

Though already called a RINO by most conservative Republicans for running a write-in campaign when she lost in Alaska's Senate Primary earlier this year, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska seems to not only be confirming her RINO status, but embracing it.

With lawsuits filed by Republican challenger Joe Miller about November's election being dismissed, Murkowski has won another six years in the Senate. Apparently, she does not care that she will be considered a traitor to her party. This is clear from her votes during the so-called "lame duck" session of Congress.

Going completely against the Republican grain, Murkowski has embraced Democratic President Barack Obama's agenda in its entirety. Obama, reeling from major Democratic defeats in last month's mid-term elections, pushed hard for a new agenda and movement. Murkowski clearly agrees.

Murkowski is the only Republican Senator who voted for each of the most visible bills that the President supported. She voted in favor of repealing the nearly two-decades old "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," which stated that members of the military would not be questioned about their sexual orientation; under it, gays were not allowed to serve openly in the military.

(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: corruption; dadt; murkowski; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Another RINO screwing up our country
1 posted on 12/23/2010 8:15:36 PM PST by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
Payback for something? I wonder what it was ........ hummm
2 posted on 12/23/2010 8:17:51 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

A woman scorned ... I hope the voters of Alaska enjoy her tantrum. Unfortunately it’s binding on the rest of us.


3 posted on 12/23/2010 8:20:02 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just reload)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

She’s a democrat now


4 posted on 12/23/2010 8:20:11 PM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Since she won as an independent, instead of as a Republican, will McConnell grow enough stones to strip her of her seniority and committee assignments? It’s not like she is the difference between the majority and minority, or that she is the difference between 40 and 41 votes to sustain a filibuster... Strip her of all advantages, and if she goes over to the Dems, good!


5 posted on 12/23/2010 8:20:22 PM PST by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WHBates
Payback for something?

I don't recall. Or wait, maybe I do. Alaska allows for recall. 6 years is too long a wait to remove Moo-cowski. I think a recall is possible. Remember, she only won the seat with 33%. And this time, she would be opposed by only one candidate.

6 posted on 12/23/2010 8:21:40 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Actually I expect her to leave the GOP caucus; maybe Dem, more likely “Independent” a la Lieberman and Sanders, and get her committee assignment fro Reid. Ditto Snowe prior to being TEA Partied in the next primary.


7 posted on 12/23/2010 8:21:52 PM PST by crusher (Political Correctness: Stalinism Without the Charm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

US Senators are NOT subject to recall.


8 posted on 12/23/2010 8:22:59 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

? I thought McCain came within a whisker of just that?


9 posted on 12/23/2010 8:28:53 PM PST by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

I must have missed it. Did Joe Miller’s challenge lose? Or is it still going on?


10 posted on 12/23/2010 8:29:15 PM PST by Defiant (There is no line on the march towards marxism that Democrats won't cross. Democrat=CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

If you count her as a Republican, then every liberal bill will be bipartisan. But I don’t. She got elected without affiliation.


11 posted on 12/23/2010 8:31:47 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

If she has an ACU rating of 40-50 over the next 6 years, we will be fortunate.


12 posted on 12/23/2010 8:33:43 PM PST by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Just what Alaskans wanted, right?


13 posted on 12/23/2010 8:33:54 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

MurCOWski was a RINO is the 11th congress,

but she ran and won as an Independent write-in,

so in the 112th congress, she had better be seated as an Indy.


14 posted on 12/23/2010 8:34:06 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

She always was


15 posted on 12/23/2010 8:36:10 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Since she won as an independent, instead of as a Republican, will McConnell grow enough stones to strip her of her seniority and committee assignments?

She could not have won the write in, without their endorsement, and their assurance to Alaska that she was secure and that the primary voters would be forgiven for choosing Miller as the GOP candidate.

16 posted on 12/23/2010 8:36:49 PM PST by ansel12 (Spock facing two Mitt Romneys, his Phaser in hand ! Spock, I'm the real Mitt. Elect me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus; All
If anybody missed it, here's a chart prepared by Freeper Texas Fossil:

Lame Duck Senate Votes

Bookmarked that thread for future reference.

17 posted on 12/23/2010 8:38:52 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

She’s not a kow, she’s a PIG.


18 posted on 12/23/2010 8:39:50 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Merry Christmas to all of my FReeper FRiends!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
RINO SEASON- Senate Republican Turncoats
Senate Republican Voting Yea in Lame Duck Session
Bill S.510 FDA Food DADT Repeal START Treaty HR3082 Budget
Alexander (R-TN) Yea Yea Yea
Barrasso (R-WY) Yea
Bennett (R-UT) Yea Yea
Brown (R-MA) Yea Yea Yea Yea
Bunning (R-KY) Yea
Burr (R-NC) Yea Yea
Cochran (R-MS) Yea Yea
Collins (R-ME) Yea Yea Yea Yea
Corker (R-TN) Yea Yea
Ensign (R-NV) Yea Yea
Enzi (R-WY) Yea Yea
Grassley (R-IA) Yea Yea
Gregg (R-NH) Yea Yea
Hutchison (R-TX) Yea
Isakson (R-GA) Yea
Johanns (R-NE) Yea Yea Yea
Kirk (R-IL) Yea Yea Yea
Kyl (R-AZ) Yea
LeMieux (R-FL) Yea
Lugar (R-IN) Yea Yea Yea
McConnell (R-KY) Yea
Murkowski (R-AK) Yea Yea Yea Yea
Roberts (R-KS) Yea
Sessions (R-AL) Yea
Shelby (R-AL) Yea
Snowe (R-ME) Yea Yea Yea Yea
Thune (R-SD) Yea
Vitter (R-LA) Yea
Voinovich (R-OH) Yea Yea Yea Yea
Not Voting
Bond (R-MO) Not voting Not voting Not voting
Brownback (R-KS) Not voting Not voting Not voting
Bunning (R-KY) Not voting Not voting
Gregg (R-NH) Not voting Not voting
Hatch (R-UT) Not voting

19 posted on 12/23/2010 8:41:05 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

skank...misrable rino skank witch. I hope she freezes her *&^^&*(’s off back in Alaska.


20 posted on 12/23/2010 8:43:53 PM PST by oust the louse (When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson