Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bolton.


2 posted on 12/21/2010 5:38:06 PM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ev Reeman; All

“Bolton.”

You might think that Bolton wrote this:

“Senate Republicans: Vote No on New START

December 17, 2010 12:13 P.M. By Sarah Palin

The proposed New START agreement should be evaluated by the only criteria that matters for a treaty: Is it in America’s interest? I am convinced this treaty is not. It should not be rammed through in the lame duck session using behind the scenes deal-making reminiscent of the tactics used in the health care debate.

New START actually requires the U.S. to reduce our nuclear weapons and allows the Russians to increase theirs. This is one-sided and makes no strategic sense. New START’s verification regime is weaker than the treaty it replaces, making it harder for us to detect Russian cheating. Since we now know Russia has not complied with many arms control agreements currently in force, this is a serious matter.

New START recognizes a link between offensive and defensive weapons – a position the Russians have sought for years. Russia claims the treaty constrains U.S. missile defenses and that they will withdraw from the treaty if we pursue missile defenses. This linkage virtually guarantees that either we limit our missile defenses or the Russians will withdraw from the treaty. The Obama administration claims that this is not the case; but if that is true, why agree to linking offensive and defensive weapons in the treaty? At the height of the Cold War, President Reagan pursued missile defense while also pursuing verifiable arms control with the then-Soviet Union. That position was right in the 1980’s, and it is still right today. We cannot and must not give up the right to missile defense to protect our population – whether the missiles that threaten us come from Russia, Iran, China, North Korea, or anywhere else. I fought the Obama administration’s plans to cut funds for missile defense in Alaska while I was Governor, and I will continue to speak out for missile defenses that will protect our people and our allies.”

more http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/255568/senate-republicans-vote-no-new-start-sarah-palin?sms_ss=twitter&at_xt=4d0c591019d7208e,0


42 posted on 12/21/2010 8:15:40 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ev Reeman

John Bolton would be in a dead heat with Sarah on foreign policy IMO. They each have an advantage over the other: Bolton has had more experience; Sarah has more common sense. However, Bolton wasn’t one of the choices.


44 posted on 12/21/2010 9:55:47 PM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson