Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: IbJensen

Well, you could just wait until your very few choices of internet providers(why isn’t THAT being fought by the GOP?), blocks sites like freerepublic because they can. You’ll have little to no options in getting access.

I hope all you folks who are against net neutrality open up your eyes and see how the internet will be destroyed by monetizing every bit of data.

You want to stream netflix movies? You’ll have to buy the highest tier package. You want access to Fox News, FreeRepublic, Drudge, etc...? Sorry, we don’t have those sites, go find another provider.

You people are clueless.


4 posted on 12/19/2010 12:03:28 PM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SengirV

So we are clueless are we?

The internet has grown exponentially in size and features thanks to almost a total lack of government interference.

Given how governments of all strips have a horrendous record on almost anything they try to control it would seem that you are the clueless one here.

Anyone who believes that government can or will improve the internet experience is in serious need of immediate mental care which under obomination care might be available in 8 to 12 months providing you fit their age criteria. Don’t want to be wasting those valuable communist dollars on old people.


22 posted on 12/19/2010 3:28:45 PM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SengirV

“While the FCC plan would not bar all discrimination, it would vest vast discretion in the FCC to determine what is allowed and what is not. Critical decisions as to what is permitted and what is not would be left to the political whims of five FCC members.....”

“....communications provider Level 3 got into a business spat with Comcast over how much it will pay, if anything, Comcast to handle traffic from Level 3’s network. Such negotiations are common among networks, and the longstanding system of private interconnection agreements has worked quite well. Yet Level 3 claimed that Comcast’s request for payment to carry Level 3’s traffic violates net neutrality rules...”

***********************************************

The article started off sounding like the FCC was going to save us from pay-per-surf internet. But then somehow it turns into the Gov’t will determine what is allowed and what is not, rather than the individual companies.

But it is a hard one to say “let the free market figure it out” when there are so few providers.


35 posted on 12/19/2010 11:11:24 PM PST by 21twelve ( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson